[Tradjazz] Vinyl vs.eetc. BARBONE

[muskrat at bestweb.net]

Steve, 

I happen to be a proponent of the use of Vitamin C. Some try to convince me
that it’s of no use and perhaps it’s all in my mind. I counter with the
fact that since I’ve been taking C, I seem to get fewer colds and when I
get one, it doesn’t last as long.

Perhaps it IS all in my mind, but if it works for me, I ain’t gonna
complain.

~~

Maybe a scientist can demonstrate to me that technically analog is better
than digital and they may well be correct. BUT as with Vitamin C, if it
works for me, I’m sold.

McN



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen G Barbone" <barbonestreet at earthlink.net>
To: <tradjazz at list.okom.com>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:27 PM
Subject: [Tradjazz] Vinyl vs. CD or DVD

> Hi Guys:
> 
> No question about it. Vinyl captures complete sound waves because it  
> is analog. And the original sound being recorded as the band plays, is  
> analog. CD's are digital and capture the sound incompletely in a  
> series of steps, thus missing part of the original analog sound.
> 
> For the technical explanation, with pictures, see:
> 
> http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question487.htm
> 
> Cheers,
> Steve Barbone
> 
> www.barbonestreet.com
> www.myspace.com/barbonestreetjazzband
> 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
>> Bruce McN muskrat at bestweb.net wrote (polite snip)
>>
>> George (and everybody),
>>
>> What started this thing was that original message which was passed  
>> on to
>> me.  My comments are my personal opinions and observations.  I have  
>> not
>> checked out the comparisons of sound, with any test equipment other  
>> than my
>> ears, which as yours, are pretty damned good judges of sound quality.
>>
>> Perhaps someone more knowedgeable than we, will post some comments.  
>> For
>> that matter, I welcome comments from anyone and everyone.   
>> (remainder snipped)
> 
>